In America, for example, crime has become a national disaster. What makes the matter worse is that incarceration has done very little to correct wayward behavior. In the recent past, national authorities have embraced correctional policies in a bid to persuade citizens to stop engaging in criminal activities.
When viewed from this lens, one may contend that the death penalty is the sole sure way of deterring would-be criminals from capital crime. On the other continuum of this dilemma are civil rights bodies and humanitarian groups. Everybody understands that the human life is sacred and that it should be treated as such.
In addition to this, every national constitution has a universal clause that seeks to protect human life. In consideration of this truth, it emerges that the death penalty is neither advantageous nor prejudicial. Common dissertations written by students take the form of persuasive essay on death penalty: When writing such an essay, one must provide a background into the topic. The next step is to take a position, either to support or refute the notion of imposing death penalty.
The reasons for the position taken must be provided. This is followed by a counter argument, with supporting reasons. For illustration purposes, a brief persuasive essay on this topic is as follows:.
Without going into the details of any given judicial system, there are number of reasons to support both sides of the argument. There are a number of practical arguments made for the death penalty.
Because the death penalty is such a powerful construct, many argue that it decreases crime rates through deterrence. Criminals rarely think about the consequences of their actions and this is especially true with crimes of passion.
By killing felons, the death penalty removes the burden of housing them within the penitentiary system. Prison overcrowding and overstretched resources are key issues in prisons in many countries. And if they were paroled, there is always the chance they could re-offend, which is completely eliminated with the death penalty.
The concept of retribution, that the perpetrator is punished in a manner fitting to the crime, is also used to support the death penalty. There are many arguments against the death penalty that are both practical and ethical. It is very difficult to know the exact moral status of the death penalty, though many see it to be a degrading, barbaric, and amoral. The arguments stating that it should be abolished are based on another biblical reference of thou shalt not kill, or two wrongs do not make a single right.
In this case, this too is a moral dilemma. Again there is the issue of new scientific advancements, coming about every day. So the possibility for a wrong execution or a mistake in the evidence is a very huge possibility, and for most it is not worth the possibility of a person being wrongly executed making the state no better than the person they are executing. As I stated earlier the average cost of a death penalty case is 2.
Since each state has different costs of housing long term prisoners. The federal government however has asked that the death penalty be reevaluated in a lot of cases because of the current economic crisis. In certain states there is an automatic review of all death penalty cases, just in case there is cause for an appeal. Then if the prisoner himself files an appeal this can take years and since most cases filed from the prisons are pro se motions then this sets up the taxpayers for more cost for attorneys to be hired to look at and possibly present those cases to an appeals court in each state and the United States Supreme Court if necessary.
This process can literally take years, review of evidence, motions, etc, so they taxpayers are paying the cost to house these prisoners for however long it may take them to see their appeal through. So, either way the cost can be stupendous for taxpayers, and is a reason a lot of crimes are being reevaluated and even reclassified in some states. If you want to suggest me to write a sample on any other topic, please contact me here.
Your email address will not be published.
the death penalty has disproportionately been applied in cases in which the defendant is nonwhite or the victim is white. There are several effective arguments against the death penalty, including the fact that some people have been executed, and the government has later discovered their innocence.
In consideration of this truth, it emerges that the death penalty is neither advantageous nor prejudicial. Common dissertations written by students take the form of persuasive essay on death penalty: the pros and cons. When writing such an essay, one must provide a background into the topic.
Essay The Death Penalty: A Discussion on Its Pros and Cons Words | 5 Pages The death penalty, a constant source of controversy and divided opinion, is the punishment of death given to criminals who commit severe crimes. Death Penalty Essay Introduction This penalty is a capital punishment offered by courts or even administrators for those guilty in some severe cases. This punishment is an age old practice and has been practiced in all parts of the world for centuries by kings, rulers, and governments.
Analytical Essay: The Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty in the United States October 18, December 26, Julie Petersen The pros and cons of the death penalty in the United States has been an issue of debate since its inception. Students can be essay cons pros death penalty and a radical change. At a total of, if we look at the ult-sponsored north oxfordshire academy regarding weekend training preparing for the schools, wish to understand the developments influenced by their individual performance and c control no cbm.