Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships.
More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited.
All web sites utilized are authoritative. All web sites utilized are credible. Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Cites all data obtained from other sources.
APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. Cites most data obtained from other sources. Example 1 - Research Paper Rubric. Characteristics to note in the rubric: Language is descriptive, not evaluative. This rubric is developed for a specific writing assignment; it would need to be revised to describe the expectations for each specific assignment. Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment.
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment. Grading Criteria Used for College Writing. Here is an excellent example of clearly defined criteria for evaluating student writing. Not surprising, since it comes from our experts in College Writing! Many other faculty use these criteria to guide and evaluate student writing. Doing so helps us create a set of common practices for teaching writing at USM. The rubric allowed me to explain how form and content are connected.
How to Create a Scoring Rubric. Here are some tips and articles on designing and using a scoring rubric for assessing student learning in the classroom. An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning … By Stevens and Levi. It has shifted my ideas about rubrics significantly. The link above takes you to a review of the book; sub-links connect to a brief interview with Wilson and an excerpt from her book.
Characteristics to note in the rubric: Language is descriptive, not evaluative. Labels for degrees of success are descriptive (“Expert” “Proficient”, etc.); by avoiding the use of letters representing grades or numbers representing points, there is no implied contract that qualities of the paper will “add up” to a specified score or grade or that all .
Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’ s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished .
Research Paper Grading Rubric Name: Course: Date: (The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.) CATEGORY Unacceptable (Below Standards) Acceptable (Meets Standards) Good (Occasionally Exceeds) Excellent (Exceeds Standards) SCORE. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.. Free rubric builder and assessment tools.
Research Paper Rubric (A) (B) (C) (D) (F) Thesis clearly stated and appropriately focused clearly stated but focus could have been sharper thesis phrasing too simple. Research Paper Rubric Student Name _____ INTRODUCTION Research subject is clearly identified 1 2 3 4 5 A general overview of the subject/debate is provided 1 2 3 4 5.